***Editor’s Note*** This article was written before the completion of a study by the USGS (2014) which found a 58% reduction in toxins in Austin’s primary waters nine years after the ban went into effect in 2006. For more on this study see this link.
The benefits of banning coal tar pavement sealant are both immediate and long term in a similar manner to quitting smoking. They also occur at the watershed level and at the parking lot level. Nonetheless this is frequently misunderstood or misconstrued. One of those misunderstandings is perpetuated by an industry study that showed no change in the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) levels 2.5 years after the ban went into effect in Austin, Texas. The argument is that if the levels didn’t go down in 2 to 3 years then maybe coal tar sealants weren’t the problem after all.
This myth was covered some time ago on this site in post entitled Industry “Study” Says No Effect in Austin From Sealant Ban and is still worth a read if you’re interested in the topic. Here are the reasons why the watershed effects are not more immediate:
- Two separate studies have shown that the wear-off rate of coal tar sealants is less than 10% per year. If no additional sealer is used, then it will take around 10 years for the sealant to stop yielding its pollutant load to the adjacent environment.
- Some of the PAHs are extremely stable chemicals that don’t break down easily in the environment. EPA calls them “persistent.” These are the same chemicals that make up the majority of toxic sites in the US even though many industrial operations have been closed for decades.
- Streams were sampled in the industry study and they tend to be “flashy,” meaning that with high velocity rain events there is a lot of mixing of old sediment and new sediment deposits creating a high degree of uncertainty.
- When looking at other banned chemicals like DDT, the USGS says that a half-life of about 15 years is expected. This means that the level of a banned substance will take about 15 years to reduce to one half of its pre-ban level.
- Below are two videos, one with the USGS and one with the City of Austin where both explain the long term view required when looking for watershed-level effects of a coal tar sealant ban.